LibreTimes

Search results for “LIME”

115 results

Fast and modular regularized topic modelling

2017Conference paperDenis Kochedykov, Murat Apishev, Lev Golitsyn, Konstantin Vorontsov

Topic modelling is an area of text mining that has been actively developed in the last 15 years. A probabilistic topic model extracts a set of hidden topics from a collection of text documents. It defines each topic by a probability distribution over words and describes each document with a probability distribution over topics. In applications, there are often many requirements, such as, for example, problem-specific knowledge and additional data, to be taken into account. Therefore, it is natural for topic modelling to be considered a multiobjective optimization problem. However, historically, Bayesian learning became the most popular approach for topic modelling. In the Bayesian paradigm, all requirements are formalized in terms of a probabilistic generative process. This approach is not always convenient due to some limitations and technical difficulties. In this work, we develop a non-Bayesian multiobjective approach called the Additive Regularization of Topic Models (ARTM). It is based on regularized Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE), and we show that many of the well-known Bayesian topic models can be re-formulated in a much simpler way using the regularization point of view. We review some of the most important types of topic models: multimodal, multilingual, temporal, hierarchical, graph-based, and short-text. The ARTM framework enables easy combination of different types of models to create new models with the desired properties for applications. This modular “lego-style” technology for topic modelling is implemented in the open-source library BigARTM.
0
6

Regularization, robustness and sparsity of probabilistic topic models

2012Journal articleKonstantin Vyacheslavovich Vorontsov, Anna Alexandrovna Potapenko

Computer Research and Modeling

We propose a generalized probabilistic topic model of text corpora which can incorporate heuristics of Bayesian regularization, sampling, frequent parameters update, and robustness in any combinations. Wellknown models PLSA, LDA, CVB0, SWB, and many others can be considered as special cases of the proposed broad family of models. We propose the robust PLSA model and show that it is more sparse and performs better that regularized models like LDA.
0
5

Learning Topic Models with Arbitrary Loss

2020Conference paperMurat Apishev, Konstantin Vorontsov

Topic modeling is an area of text analysis actively developing over the past 20 years. A probabilistic topic model (PTM) finds a set of hidden topics from a collection of text documents. It defines each topic as a probability distribution over words and describes each document as a probability mixture of topic distributions. Learning algorithms for topic models are usually based on Bayesian inference or log-likelihood maximization. In both cases, EM-like algorithms are used. In this paper, we propose to replace the logarithm in the log-likelihood by an arbitrary smooth loss function. We prove that such a modification preserves both the structure of the algorithm and compatibility with any regularizers in terms of additive regularization of topic models (ARTM). Moreover, in the case of a linear loss, the Estep becomes much faster due to the omission of a normalization. We study combinations of the fast and usual E-steps and compare them to regularization using different number of topics in both offline and online versions of EM-algorithm. For an empirical comparison of the algorithms, we estimate perplexity, coherence, and learning time. We use an efficient parallel implementation of the EM-algorithm from the BigARTM open-source library. We show that in most cases the two-stage strategy wins, which uses fast E-steps at the beginning of iterations, then proceeds with usual E-steps.
0
6

Improving the Quality of Machine Translation Using the Reverse Model

2022Journal articleN. A. Skachkov, K. V. Vorontsov

Automation and Remote Control

Machine translation is a natural language text processing task that aims to automatically translate input text from one language into another language. The currently known machine translation models show a fairly high quality of translation between large languages, but for smaller language areas, represented by less data, the problem is still not solved. Different methods are used to deal with various errors in automatic translation systems. This paper discusses approaches that use translation models of reverse language directions and improve consistency between translations of the same text using direct and reverse translation models. The paper presents a general theoretical justification for such methods in terms of solving the likelihood maximization problem and also proposes a method for stable training of modern models using cyclic translations.
0
4

Reranking Hypotheses in Translation Models Using Human Markup

2024Journal articleK. V. Vorontsov, N. A. Skachkov

Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International

Modern machine translation systems are trained on large volumes of parallel data obtained using heuristic methods of bypassing the Internet. The poor quality of the data leads to systematic translation errors, which can be quite noticeable to humans. To fix such errors, human-based models for reranking hypotheses is introduced in this study. In this paper the use of human markup is shown not only to increase the overall quality of the translation but also to significantly reduce the number of systematic translation errors. In addition, the relative simplicity of human markup and its integration in the model training process opens up new opportunities in the field of domain adaptation of translation models for new domains like online retail.
0
6

Hypotheses re-ranking in translation models using human markup

2024Journal articleK. V. Vorontsov, N. A. Skachkov

Известия Российской академии наук Теория и системы управления

Modern machine translation systems are trained on large volumes of parallel data obtained using heuristic methods of the Internet bypassing. The poor quality of the data leads to systematic translation errors, which can be quite noticeable from the human point of view. To fix such errors a human based models hypotheses re-ranking is introduced in this work. In this paper the use of human markup is shown not only to increase the overall quality of translation, but also to significantly reduce the number of systematic translation errors. In addition, the relative simplicity of human markup and its integration in the model training process opens up new opportunities in the field of domain adaptation of translation models for new domains like online retail.
0
2

The methodology of multi-criteria evaluation of text markup models based on inconsistent expert markup

2025Conference paperAlexander Levikin, Ildar Khabutdinov, Andrey Grabovoy, Konstantin Vorontsov

Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies

A wide class of natural language processing tasks is solved using markup.At the moment, the vast majority of models and datasets rely on a simple markup structure containing only fragments and labels.Moreover, simple classification metrics such as F1, Precision, Recall are used to evaluate the model's accuracy.The problem with such metrics is that they do not take into account all aspects of the markup structure and that they are applicable only under the assumption of the existence of an ideal markup.This paper proposes a more general and universal markup structure that allows solving complex problems and builds a methodology for multi-criteria evaluation of text markup models based on inconsistent expert markup.After that, the application of the constructed method is considered to assess the quality of the model obtained within the winning algorithm of the "READ//ABLE" competition, which focused on building an effective essay markup system.The results demonstrate that the new markup structure and evaluation approach provides a more comprehensive and accurate assessment of model performance, addressing the limitations of traditional metrics by accounting for complex markup scenarios and expert inconsistencies.
0
5

Reinforcement Networks: novel framework for collaborative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning tasks

2025PreprintKryzhanovskiy, Maksim, Glazyrina, Svetlana, Ischenko, Roman, Vorontsov, Konstantin

arXiv (Cornell University)

Modern AI systems often comprise multiple learnable components that can be naturally organized as graphs. A central challenge is the end-to-end training of such systems without restrictive architectural or training assumptions. Such tasks fit the theory and approaches of the collaborative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) field. We introduce Reinforcement Networks, a general framework for MARL that organizes agents as vertices in a directed acyclic graph (DAG). This structure extends hierarchical RL to arbitrary DAGs, enabling flexible credit assignment and scalable coordination while avoiding strict topologies, fully centralized training, and other limitations of current approaches. We formalize training and inference methods for the Reinforcement Networks framework and connect it to the LevelEnv concept to support reproducible construction, training, and evaluation. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on several collaborative MARL setups by developing several Reinforcement Networks models that achieve improved performance over standard MARL baselines. Beyond empirical gains, Reinforcement Networks unify hierarchical, modular, and graph-structured views of MARL, opening a principled path toward designing and training complex multi-agent systems. We conclude with theoretical and practical directions - richer graph morphologies, compositional curricula, and graph-aware exploration. That positions Reinforcement Networks as a foundation for a new line of research in scalable, structured MARL.
0
4

Basic Operations on Matrices

2026TheorySergey

Addition, scalar multiplication, transposition and multiplication of matrices, along with subtraction, powers, and trace.
0
150

Properties of Matrix Operations

2026TheorySergey

The basic properties of addition, scalar multiplication, transposition, and multiplication of matrices, with justifications.
0
180

Determinant

2026TheorySergey

The determinant of a square matrix — its meaning, minors and cofactors, Laplace expansion, and computation methods.
0
190

Determinant via Permutations

2026TheorySergey

The direct definition of a determinant via permutations: inversions, parity, and a sum of n! terms.

0
170

Properties of Determinants

2026TheorySergey

The basic properties of determinants with brief proofs, and their use in simplifying computations.
0
260

Inverse Matrices

2026TheorySergey

Nonsingular matrices, the invertibility criterion, the adjugate-matrix formula, and the Gauss–Jordan method.
0
120

Matrix Rank

2026TheorySergey

Minors and the rank of a matrix, invariance of rank under elementary transformations, and a practical method for computing it.
0
190

Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues

2026TheorySergey

Eigenvectors and eigenvalues, the characteristic equation, eigenspaces, and diagonalization of matrices.
0
170

Change of Basis

2026TheorySergey

The change-of-basis matrix, recomputing a vector's coordinates and an operator's matrix, and the orthonormal case.
0
220

Quadratic Forms

2026TheorySergey

Quadratic forms and their matrix, definiteness, Sylvester's criterion, and canonical form.
0
160

IMO 1973

2026Problem sheet

International mathematics competition for pre-university students, held annually since 1959. Six problems over two days.
0
240